|
IF job is CPU bound and IF workload can be run in parallel, either by submitting another job that does "half" the work OR job is running SQL and SMP feature is installed and turned on. That said, my experience is that it's rarely the CPU issue but rather I/O or simply process has to be serialized (i.e. one thing has to be done before another one can). Celebrating 10-Years of SQL Performance Excellence -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve McKay Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:36 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Multiple processors We have a partition which runs *one* batch job and one interactive session for the operator that checks on the batch job occasionally. This batch job runs for days at a time and when it finishes, another similar job is kicked off by the operator. We want to reduce the run time of the batch job. One suggestion is to add another processor to the partition. I'm not convinced that adding another processor will improve the run time. So my dumb question for today is: Will adding another processor to a partition running a single batch job decrease the run time of the batch job? Thanks, Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.