|
Hi Pat,
The concept is a little strange when you first come across it. It's been on the box for many years, but is lightly used in my opinion.
==>IMHO it's a useful feature and a handy solution to lots of situations, like apparently Mikes', but new users should proceed with caution. IMHO multiple members should remain "lightly used" because they can complicate your life really quick, especially if you start defining LF members based on this and that list of PF members, and so on. And using SQL to get to data in multiple-member files is kind of a kludge sometimes.. --Alan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.