RE: executing jobs in sequence -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: executing jobs in sequence
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:40:55 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I am not speaking from personal experience.
However I've heard that some prefer the Advanced Job Scheduler (5722-JS1) 
from IBM vs the one that IBM provides with the operating system.  And it 
is because you can do things like
If job A fails then don't run Job B, etc.
Along with some additional features.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/jscheduler/

Some people also prefer Robot.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: executing jobs in sequence , Holden Tommy

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.