|
My point was that people seem to accept broken code as OK, cause that's the way it's always been. I think we have come a long way in beginning to accept this crap as far superior by accepting the errors. The earlier version called Code400 should have been banned from pc's in general, but as long as it was considerd "leading edge", it was ok ???? Sorry...I think something is wrong with that thought process. I have been keeping two or three source programs open at one time for a great many years. I typically use three or four screens while writing code. (3488 and SEU) My complaint is with you guys accepting broken as being "normal".... Forget the style of programming. Jon Paris wrote:
Nope - I typically work with multiple sources at a time. Moving back and forwards between the DDS for display/file and the main programs, subprocedure sources, etc. I can't remember the last time I worked on a single source.
I haven't "lost" anything since moving to V6 - and even on V5 it was a rarity - and was usually fully recoverable from the workspace.
Is it sometimes frustrating - yes. But it runs on Windows so it goes with the territory. I also find iSeries Access, Word, Excel, IE, Firefox, ... equally frustrating at times - but I still use them.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.