|
Don, There is an IBM bulletin, dated 11/18, with several fixes for Management Central, that refer to the 2007 DST changes. The document number for V5R3 is 352613535. Hope this helps. Regards, Luis Rodriguez midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- message: 1 date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:14:32 -0600 from: "Don Cavaiani" subject: RE: North America - 2007 Daylight Saving Time changes I get message: SI24906 is not available? -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neil Palmer Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 3:07 PM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: North America - 2007 Daylight Saving Time changes FYI Some IBM web pages that may be useful: General: http://www.ibm.com/support/alerts/daylightsavingstimealert.html Operating Systems: http://www.ibm.com/support/alerts/operatingsystem/us/ i5/OS (including PTF info): http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/software/globalization/dst .html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. ------------------------------ message: 2 date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:21:10 -0500 from: "Jim Franz" subject: Re: SAV with SAVACT(*YES) halted on Eclipse objects
don't put Eclipse or WDSC workspaces in the IFS...
Vern - I didn't... WDSC or an Eclipe has never run on this box. Websphere server never setup. This is old fashioned SEU & RPG II,III,IV. The timestamps on these files indicate they came from cume C6192 ptfs (including hiper & db2 groups) I installed after the V5R4 release. jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vernon Hamberg" To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: Re: SAV with SAVACT(*YES) halted on Eclipse objects
Uffda! All I can say is, don't put Eclipse or WDSC workspaces in the IFS - someone is bound to have WDSC left open on their PC. And this means not to put workspaces on a drive mapped to the IFS, of course. At 07:50 AM 11/21/2006, you wrote:Is there something I need to shut down before SAV? V5R4 - this is 1st save after release upgrade that was not a dedicated system. (have not started any WDS or Eclipse functions that I know of. Have not had this problem on other V5R4 systems. 5705 - SAV DEV('/QSYS.LIB/TAP01.DEVD') OBJ(('/*') ('/QSYS.LIB' *OMIT) ('/QDLS' *OMIT)) SAVACT(*YES) SAVACTOPT(*NONE) ENDOPT(*UNLOAD) UPDHST(*YES) Object in use. Object is /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.applicationlock. Cannot open object /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.applicationlock. Object in use. Object is /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat/c atalina.2006-11-19.log. Cannot open object /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat/c atalina.2006-11-19.log. Ownership of object QZLSCKSVR in QTEMP type *USRSPC changed. 40703 blocks processed for sequence 401, volume IBMIRD, on device TAP01. 107969 objects saved. 2 not saved. Function check. CPF3837 unmonitored by NITSAV at statement 5705, instruction X'0055'. CPF3837 received by NITSAV at 5705. (C D I R) jim franz -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.-- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
midrange.com
------------------------------
message: 3
date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:39:18 -0500
from: ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: IXS Migration
Ok, here's the way i'm reading it from the IBM Windows Integration site:
Migrating an IXS server to new hardware is basically the same as recovering
an IXS server if the underlying IXS card is compatible as far as 'hot
spare' support is concerned. If we are moving IXS installs from existing
2892-002s to new 2892-002s or 2892-001s, it should be very similar to
recovering an IXS install, correct? I've tested the recovery many times
and it works like a charm.
Below is the info from the integration website... from what I can see, the
2892-002s are still marketed, does anyone know anything to the contrary?
We will be migrating 2 520s late next year to new i5 520s and each of the
520s has several IXS cards.
Integrated xSeries Server(IXS) hot spare: In order to use hot spare between
IXS servers, they
should be compatible types and they should have a comparable configuration of
LAN adapters,
etc. The Integrated xSeries server configurations table gives the specific IXS
hot spare
configurations that are supported.
2892-002
2.0 GHz Xeon? IXS, 4GB memory, USB, built in 10/100 Mbps Ethernet.
Optional
10/100/1000 Mbps Ethernet, 1 Gbps Ethernet (optical) and 4/16/100
Mbps token-ring.
2892-002, 2892-001
V5R4,
V5R3,
V5R2
Windows Server 2003 R2
Standard and Enterprise
Editions; Windows Server 2003
Standard,
Enterprise and Web Editions;
Windows 2000
Server; Windows 2000 Advanced
Server; Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 3.0 ES
Edition and Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 3.0 AS
Edition
------------------------------
message: 4
date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:18:26 -0500
from: Al Barsa
subject: Re: SAV with SAVACT(*YES) halted on Eclipse objects
If you would like a copy of my handout from COMMON on save-while-active,
please send me private mail. This is a relative complicated subject.
Al
Al Barsa, Jr.
Barsa Consulting Group, LLC
400>390
"i" comes before "p", "x" and "z"
e gads
Our system's had more names than Elizabeth Taylor!
914-251-1234
914-251-9406 fax
http://www.barsaconsulting.com
http://www.taatool.com
http://www.as400connection.com
"Jim Franz"
r.com> To
Sent by:
midrange-l-bounce cc
s@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
SAV with SAVACT(*YES) halted on
11/21/2006 08:51 Eclipse objects
AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems
Technical
Discussion
nge.com>
Is there something I need to shut down before SAV?
V5R4 - this is 1st save after release upgrade that was not a dedicated
system.
(have not started any WDS or Eclipse functions that I know of.
Have not had this problem on other V5R4 systems.
5705 - SAV DEV('/QSYS.LIB/TAP01.DEVD') OBJ(('/*') ('/QSYS.LIB' *OMIT)
('/QDLS' *OMIT)) SAVACT(*YES) SAVACTOPT(*NONE) ENDOPT(*UNLOAD)
UPDHST(*YES)
Object in use. Object is
/QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.applicationlock.
Cannot open object
/QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.applicationlock.
Object in use. Object is
/QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat/c
atalina.2006-11-19.log.
Cannot open object
/QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat/c
atalina.2006-11-19.log.
Ownership of object QZLSCKSVR in QTEMP type *USRSPC changed.
40703 blocks processed for sequence 401, volume IBMIRD, on device TAP01.
107969 objects saved. 2 not saved.
Function check. CPF3837 unmonitored by NITSAV at statement 5705,
instruction X'0055'.
CPF3837 received by NITSAV at 5705. (C D I R)
jim franz
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
------------------------------
message: 5
date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:47:02 -0500
from: "Jim Franz"
subject: Re: SAV with SAVACT(*YES) halted on Eclipse objects
My mistake.. the timestamps on these files are from ipl to B side
just after v5r4 upgrade, just before C6192 cume load/install.
jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Franz"
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: SAV with SAVACT(*YES) halted on Eclipse objects
don't put Eclipse or WDSC workspaces in the IFS...Vern - I didn't... WDSC or an Eclipe has never run on this box. Websphere server never setup. This is old fashioned SEU & RPG II,III,IV. The timestamps on these files indicate they came from cume C6192 ptfs (including hiper & db2 groups) I installed after the V5R4 release. jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vernon Hamberg" To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: Re: SAV with SAVACT(*YES) halted on Eclipse objectsUffda! All I can say is, don't put Eclipse or WDSC workspaces in the IFS - someone is bound to have WDSC left open on their PC. And this means not to put workspaces on a drive mapped to the IFS, of course. At 07:50 AM 11/21/2006, you wrote:Is there something I need to shut down before SAV? V5R4 - this is 1st save after release upgrade that was not a dedicated system. (have not started any WDS or Eclipse functions that I know of. Have not had this problem on other V5R4 systems. 5705 - SAV DEV('/QSYS.LIB/TAP01.DEVD') OBJ(('/*') ('/QSYS.LIB' *OMIT) ('/QDLS' *OMIT)) SAVACT(*YES) SAVACTOPT(*NONE) ENDOPT(*UNLOAD) UPDHST(*YES) Object in use. Object is /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.applicationlock. Cannot open object /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.applicationlock. Object in use. Object is /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat/c atalina.2006-11-19.log. Cannot open object /QIBM/UserData/Eclipse/workspace/.metadata/.plugins/org.eclipse.tomcat/c atalina.2006-11-19.log. Ownership of object QZLSCKSVR in QTEMP type *USRSPC changed. 40703 blocks processed for sequence 401, volume IBMIRD, on device TAP01. 107969 objects saved. 2 not saved. Function check. CPF3837 unmonitored by NITSAV at statement 5705, instruction X'0055'. CPF3837 received by NITSAV at 5705. (C D I R) jim franz -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.-- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.-- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
------------------------------ message: 6 date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:18:14 -0500 from: rob@xxxxxxxxx subject: Re: monmsg question Here! Here! Just last week a coworker was sure that he had a security limitation that was causing him an issue with a canned software package. It did a deletion of a user space and then did a creation. Apparently IBM lumped too damned many possibilities in the message for the deletion of a user space (second level text for CPF2125 indicates that it may either be a security failure, or it did not exist, etc - how stupid can you get?) Now, in this case, IBM got lazy and decided to make it harder to do an appropriate monmsg. Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
