|
Dave - wont the same thing happen if you attempt to update a record in RPG/RPGILE/COBOL etc, if the program does NOT have a lock on that record. If another user has a lock on that record, the program cannot get an exclusive lock Alan Shore NBTY, Inc (631) 244-2000 ext. 5019 AShore@xxxxxxxx midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/17/2006 01:39:01 PM:
I have a fellow programmer who has this code in a CL program: Update OEP013W a set a.wkclosr = (select mtclon from OETITLP b where a.wkorder = b.mtordn) where a.wkclosr = 0 Where OEP013W is a work file in QTEMP; OETITLP is a production PF. If someone is in the record (locking it) this statement fails. If you do the sub-SELECT statement by itself with someone locking the record, it doesn't fail. Does a SELECT in an UPDATE statement have different rules? It was our understanding that a SELECT did not lock, or require a lock, and we assumed would not be inhibited by someone else locking a record in that file. TIA Dave -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.