|
Hi: Couldn't let the "can't afford to create such a disruption" comment go. Doesn't anyone remember, "DOS isn't done until Lotus won't run?" And that was back when Lotus 123 ruled the spreadsheet roost, and a large number of PCs -- *all* of which ran Microsoft OS and paid a hefty royalty -- were purchased for the sole purpose of running Lotus. I see no evidence that the leopard even thinks his spots are outdated. Doesn't mean I don't use, and often like, Microsoft products. But c'mon. Darrell Darrell A. Martin - 630-754-2187 Manager, Computer Operations dmartin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/13/2006 09:14:49 PM:
Perhaps (like most vendors) MS does not operate the way they used to,
but
I can remember the days when new MS versions created backward
compatibility
issues for many vendors, not just IBM. MS makes no claim that 100% of
DOS,
3.1,95,2000,millenium, XP can all run on Vista. MS cannot afford to
create
such a disruption in the marketplace.
[snip] This e-mail, including attachments, may contain information that is confidential and/or proprietary, and may only be used by the person to whom this email is addressed. If the recipient of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or an authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If this e-mail has been delivered to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and deleting this e-mail immediately.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.