Re: iSeries Security in Computerworld

["Randy Mangham" <rmangham@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'd agree that the article is accurate although I've worked in corporate
environments both as an employee and as a contractor where the "i" side of
the house had implemented far more strict security than the corresponding
Windows, Unix, Linux side of the house which is frequently under a
completely different set of operations managers who "don't get it" when it
comes to security. At my last employer I got our i890 through the SOx audit
without a single observation of non-compliance but I can guarantee you the
Windows/Unix folks had quite a few observations of non-compliance.

On 11/3/06, Michael Ryan <michaelrtr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd say that article is pretty accurate.
>
> On 11/3/06, Don <dr2@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Well,
> >
> > this is intresting....
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&arti
> > cleId=9004609&intsrc=article_more_side
> >
> > Don in DC
> >
> > --
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> > list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
> >
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.