|
Hi, It's impossible to give a direct answer to this question. There's a heck a lot of factors to consider. Here are my thoughts: Who handles user support? Separate, or is this the sysadmins job too? Who handles the client systems? Are they running a full OS (like Windows or Desktop Linux), or are they thin Clients? What other Systems are there? Lotus Notes? Exchange? Windows's Active Directory? File Sharing? Printer Sharing? How many users are there? What is the skill level of these users? Do they read manuals, or do they need a babysitter? What kind of software are you running? A professionally created and supported ERP system? Or a 15 year old COBOL-Applications which no one understands anymore? What kind of equipment are you running? Decently new hardware, backed by maintenance contracts? Or 10 year old 4224 connected with flaky cables? Does your sysadmin have to change toner in printers (or similar tasks)? Does your sysadmin have to support all kind of other electronical devices? (Like, Faxes, Telefones, etc.) Is your sysadmin his own boss? This means he will also need time to do administrative stuff, like talking about new equipment with his superiors, etc. The conclusions: The smaller the company is, the more stuff the sysadmin has to do. Also, depending on his skill set, the existing infrastructure, the money available to him, there are different levels of automation achievable. I work for a small System i ISV (we're 25 people), and we sell our own ERP-Software to customers. Most of them don't have own personnel, and these that do only seldom have someone knowledgable on the System i. (Which usually leads to expired HW support contracts on the machine, unsupported Releases, and CUME Levels from before the dinosaurs). Internally, we have 5 System i. They don't require much work (beside the quarterly reboot for CUME), but the same goes for our two windows servers (Beside the monthly reboot for security fixes). If you have a well designed infrastructure, running stable, supported software, with intelligent users, one sysadmin is enough to support 500 people, and the corresponding systems backing them (multiple windows servers, one system i). He will still have plenty of spare time. However, if you have a years old, flaky infrastructure, and no one willing to pay for renewals, with cranky users who don't even think about reading the manual, you might need 5-10 people for 500 users. -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ashok.Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:29 PM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: iSeries Support Question Hello all, does anyone know of any benchmarking or best practice regarding number of system admin. staff required per system? Eg. is the ratio 5 systems/sysadmin, or 9 systems per sysadmin, etc. thanks Ashok
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.