RE: Pause technique

I'm not sure that counts.

From the name, "Recover Interrupted Job" it doesn't sound like the kind

of routine checkpointing we were discussing.

Stuff happens, we all know that. Just having a recover tool isn't a bad
thing.  It's the routine use of the recovery tool that I'd have a
problem with.

Imagine having to do a RCLSTG once a day.  That would tell me something
is wrong.

Charles Wilt
--
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
  

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roger Harman
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:11 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Pause technique

Island Pacific (Retail Merchandise)
They have a process for "Recover Interrupted Job"

CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx 09/28/2006 6:50:15 AM >>>

<snip>
Lastly, I have to wonder, what is the percentages of home-grown vs.
third party software that use this technique of checkpoint validation
restartability.  Off the top of my head I can't think of a third party
package that does it, but I've not seen all that many.  Every 
place I've
seen it was a home-grown application.  That tells us something I
think....
</snip>
-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
(MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.