|
On 9/12/06, rob@xxxxxxxxx <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would argue that you DO need all of the aforementioned features. Not only do you need the security to block improper internet usage,
how? the web server runs with the authority of a single user on the system ( I am not an expert ), then the web server itself and the web apps implement their own security in terms of what the browsers have access to. If amazon.com was hosted on an i5 the process of the user logging in, ordering a book and billing it to their stored credit card number would have nothing to do with i5 security.
but you also need it to block improper back office usage. And, using a set of subsystems to manage data queue responses, Domino servers, etc to service your website really help.
ok, but I dont see this as close to the complexity of managing the traditional mix of as400 applications. job queues, scheduled jobs, reports on output queues, background jobs supporting the interactive users, all the options for object security.
And the database tools to analyze why things are going sour has converted at least one person off of MS SQLServer. (Forget where I saw that - perhaps somewhere on http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/db2/ )
yes, the system could compete on its merits. I see a downside for a company running a web site on the i5 because a need for more web site capacity could easily require a very costly upgrade. i5/OS costs $40K per core. That is many times higher priced then the p5 or Windows. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.