|
I don't think it's good or bad, as long as we don't blow up the planet we will live long and prosper. -----Original Message----- From: Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:21:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [CPF0000] The globalization of COMMON, or is this the right direction? I am curious. How much of IBM is US-owned? Do Saudi Arabia, India, European, and China investors have a significant ownership? Are we likely to wake up one day and discover that IBM, Ford, Exxon, and Intel are majority-owned by non-US investors? If so, is that good or bad? John Candidi wrote:
Just on thoguth, Is australian time the same as ours.This might explain why they are "up all night". It may actually be their day but I don't know. I'm just an innocent bystander -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trevor Perry Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 12:14 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: [CPF0000] The globalization of COMMON,or is this the right direction? Joe, Tonight, I was talking to a radiologist. He travels the country setting up radiology services. Overnight, all radiology scans are reviewed by radiologists in Australia. They pay an Australian office for the service, and since this is a new area of work for them, they are now making more money than ever before, since using the off-hour service. This is the power of globalization. Fact, not Google Search. This could just as easily have been India. But since the US has a trade surplus to Australia (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c6021.html), it does not matter? Why aren't American radiologists up all night? And, while your census figures are interesting, I noticed they include only trade figures. For some reason you missed the actual value of the asset investments by American companies in India - the FDI. Or do they not count? Trevor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Pluta" Subject: RE: [CPF0000] The globalization of COMMON,or is this the right direction?From: Trevor Perry I started with an assumption. You showed me evidence that my assumptuion was incorrect. I conceded that to you. Is that laziness?And considering the fact that all it took to refute your "assumption" (better known as rabble rousing BS) was to Google "US Trade Deficit", the answer to this question is "Yes". Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.