|
Larry,I just realized. Steve does not understand "profit". Since it is going to be hard to teach him the equation of Sales-Costs=Profit, then we are going to be unable to convince him that the System p is copied from the System i so they can reduce the costs of p and one day make a profit.
Long live System i. Trevor----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Bolhuis"
Subject: Re: Prometheus
I will cut to the conclusion and say the answer is to have i5/os as a supported OS on the p5 and do away with i5 hardware models, i5 only business partners, a lot of i5 marketing. <snip>To steal a line from Red October "You arrogant ass, you've killed US!" That is, kill all your i5 partners and you've killed the System i. Many of us (yes I am one of them) don't do p for a reason: we believe in i. Better instead to put more arrows in our quiver. With the hardware essentially identical already why not let us sell more models?There are not many published numbers to know for sure, but I dont agree the p5 is a low profit item for IBM. The $4000 for the lowest price p5 is still $4000. AIX, Linux and software subscription are in the $1000 range. DB2 brings in a good profit at $724 for the first user, $124 for additional users or $4874 per processor. Double those charges for DB2 on the enterprise ( bigger than 2 cores ) models.Software monies go other places within IBM. $4000 for a small p cannot possibly make them significant margins and likely is a loss. - Larry
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.