Re: PTF question... -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: PTF question...
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:44:01 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Rather an i5 versus an iSeries item.

But MH ptf's are for the FSP or Flexible Service Processor.  This applies 
to the rack as a whole.  MF ptfs are LIC or Licensed Internal Code and 
apply only to a specific lpar.

If you are running a single lpar, non HMC, machine there is a way to apply 
FSP updates via these MH ptf's.  On HMC managed systems I think these are 
more marker ptfs so that the lpar may know what version the FSP is 
running.

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.