× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Those large number of logicals is a real killer.

I would look at a quick little study of how many have
little or NO activity and make the slow movers get
built when needed.

I'm trying to imagine 250 different views of a single file.

ODBC is certainly not the finest access method IBM has
dreamed up...


pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I've got a client experiencing performance problems with his software package. Many of the files have a huge number of logicals built over them for various purposes. One has over 250 logicals and joined logicals. All of the files are defined as having an acces path size of 4GB. This system is also being hit with lots of ODBC requests that were permitted to be built by the previous IT manager (windoze bigot). I know how to throttle back the ODBC impact, but should I change the acces path size to 1TB for just the logicals or both the physical and its associated logicals to improve the overall performance?

Thanks

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.