|
On 21/03/06, Lapeyre, Francis <FLAPEYRE@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Which was what I meant, since not all (or even most) programs around here > check to see that the record was changed before doing an UPDATE. Since our > files have a "last changed" date and time, we are now forced to compare the > record to the previous one and only change the timestamp and issue an update > if the before and after images differ. I don't use the trigger itself to do > that; the only thing the trigger does is add records to an audit file. Does using a trigger that way buy you anything over simply journalling the file? A journal seems to me to be the cheapest and most reliable way of providing an audit trail of file changes. -- Dave...
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.