|
midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > 12. Off Topic *** ADMIN *** Alert (abolish any e-privacy) (Al Mac) > >An anonymous reader writes "The New Jersey legislature is considering a >bill that would require operators of public forums to collect users' legal >names and addresses, and effectively disallow anonymous speech on online >forums. >This raises some serious issues, such as to what extent local and state >governments can go in enacting and enforcing Internet legislation." > >link to proposed bill: >http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2006/Bills/A1500/1327_I1.HTM When I read the proposed bill and how it defines "Internet service provider" or "provider", my first thought is that any such business that currently resides in New Jersey would simply have to close down. The bill is simply unenforceable in any other way (IMO and only IMO). Weird mostly because it seems legit. Essentially no such place as 'New Jersey' to the internet after it becomes effective if it passes. Tom Liotta
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.