|
James H H Lampert wrote: > Would anybody have any suggestions for something that > would: > > 1. Be lighter than a temporary database file, preferably > living in memory, instead of on disk, and having less > overhead than a file, Memory / disk ... what's the difference? At least on the iSeries there isn't much difference. > 2. Yet still be capable of expanding to contain whatever > data records are put into it, > 3. While rejecting duplicate records? Keyed data queue? david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.