× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jones, John (US)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:20 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: RE: Determine bottlenecks during backup

<snip>
> 
> 
> As I recall at COMMON last year IBM noted about 235-250GB/hour as a
> potential speed on SCSI-attached LTO3s.  I figure slightly better than
> average compression would explain how I'm exceeding what IBM noted.
> 

IBM says 235-250GB/hour and you're getting 275MB/sec....that's more than
a little better John...our your really getting 990GB/hour?

Assuming the figure in your first post should have been
275GB/hour....then I don't feel so bad.

I'm seeing 77MB/s which is about 277GB/hour (@1000MB=1GB).

Charles


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.