|
> -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jones, John (US) > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:20 PM > To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > Subject: RE: Determine bottlenecks during backup <snip> > > > As I recall at COMMON last year IBM noted about 235-250GB/hour as a > potential speed on SCSI-attached LTO3s. I figure slightly better than > average compression would explain how I'm exceeding what IBM noted. > IBM says 235-250GB/hour and you're getting 275MB/sec....that's more than a little better John...our your really getting 990GB/hour? Assuming the figure in your first post should have been 275GB/hour....then I don't feel so bad. I'm seeing 77MB/s which is about 277GB/hour (@1000MB=1GB). Charles
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.