|
Rob, You said: >>Honestly I prefer it if they give us new features instead of new ways of spelling existing functions. << Well said; totally agree. Meanwhile as an aside, I'll keep fighting to have the iSeries and DB2/400 recognized and taken seriously as a serious alternative to ORACLE, SQL Server, etc., when the job size is similar. This because I've worked DB2 on many of the other platforms and had folks working for me on ORACLE and I know DB2/400 CAN be a contender IF its capabilities are adequately demonstrated. I keep working toward that end with competitive usage architectures showing what DB2/400 can do in the Operational Data Store, DW and DM environments. Take care, Dave
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.