|
Disclaimer: I'm currently not following what I preach on this issue. Separate ASPs were used for journal receivers for a number of reasons. 1 - Separate arms so as not to affect the performance of the primary asp. 2 - If the primary ASP had a catastrophic disk failure you could do a restore to rebuild that ASP and then do an APYJRNCHG from the receivers to catch up to the current timestamp. However, if they are in the same ASP, you're toast. If all you care about is option 1 then, like you, I suspect that the new disk drives and cache negates most of that. After all, I dropped from 42 arms down to 7 and got better performance. Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.