Re: model 270

[Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/24/06, Jim Oberholtzer <JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <snip>
> OK, not fair.  How about a similarly sized Maxtor 18GB Ultra-320 SCSI 15K
> for $75, or $4.16/GB.  New.
> </snip>
>
> Unfortunately your comparison is apple/oranges.  If you compare drives
> from those same manufacturers that are rated for the same MTBF and service
> type, you may have an argument, however the drives you site are not
> manufactured  with the same tolerances.  We have had this discussion
> before. The drives you site in the comparisons are not equivalent drives
> from those manufacturers to the ones IBM uses in its enterprise class
> servers (z, p, & i) .  Even Hitachi who manufactures a very high
> percentage of the drives for IBM has two models in the 17 gig variety. One
> for real server usage (i, p, & z) , and the other for the consumer market
> and folks that do the very comparison that you just did.
>
> Sorry if I just won't bite on that argument.


No problem there, Jim.  I understand it's not a pure apples to apples
comparison, although I would argue for a Jonathon to Macintosh comparison
vs. an apples/oranges one.

I am not a manager, and I don't participate in system acquisition
decision-making, so I don't really know the market.  And I certainly won't
pretend to know the value / extra cost ratio of the improved MTBF/service
type/tolerances, but the 900% premium seems steep to me.

- Dan