|
What about "capacity on demand" where you can call up IBM, spend some $$$, get a temporary code, and get the system to start using more of the processor(s) that it already has? It's been around awhile and IBM was touting it at the last COMMON. We are cruising along just fine on our system so I haven't paid a lot of attention to it but is this a tax for batch as well as interactive or is it just another reference to the interactive tax? It's their system, their marketing, and their pricing scheme. If we don't like it we can either take it or leave it. It just doesn't seem right, kind of like buying a Porsche and not being able to drive it faster than 45 MPH unless you pay an extra 20K. Maybe it isn't marketing so much as it is reducing the number of models that they physically produce but retaining the multi-model pricing structure. Then again, maybe it is all marketing. Dave Parnin -- Nishikawa Standard Company Topeka, IN 46571 daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.