|
> On a wider note, it sounds like you are trying to improve performance. > I've been preaching here a couple times in the last few weeks about the > hazards of using READE over a large data set, since it doesn't read from > a block of records in memory, but actually hits the file for every read. It sounds like you are describing a bug. I can't think of a single reason why READE should not perform nearly as well as READ, other than the overhead of the key comparisons. How badly does it perform, in comparison to a READ? If it's not been implemented properly by IBM than we should file a bug report. Has anyone filed a PMR on this matter? Regards, Rich
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.