|
On 12/8/05, pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx <pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Brian, > > You would probably be better off if you used QPGMR for your stuff. Your > programmers will get cranky if their compiles are held up because QBATCH > is busy. > -- I would be far more concerned about cranky users when their jobs are held up because of long compiles. They are actually transacting business! That said, the compiles should absolutely be in a separate subsystem. That subsystem and the compile job descriptions can be tuned to find the best balance between the programmer whining and user convenience. Programmers who game that system should be dealt with stermly. How about forcing the programmers to use WDSc and reducing the number of compiles that are required? -- Tom Jedrzejewicz tomjedrz@xxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
