|
We looked at HATS and WebFacing tools. Ended up using WebFacing which was quick and easy. Also, cheap. HATS was licensed by the user not the box, could have been very expensive to use. Kat Kruse IT Engineer Qualcomm, Inc. kkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxx (858) 845-0014 -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Franz Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:27 To: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Websphere HATS vs other methods I have missed several Common and other conferences, and need a quick refresher on the good, bad & ugly on Websphere HATS and other products. A client (software co) is wanting to "kick the tires" (again) of providing a gui interface. Many new users coming only trained to point & click, plus there is a need for a Mc-jobs like touchscreen app for several departments. Solution needed for both small clients & large. TIA Jim Franz -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
