RE: QUSRTOOL and asyncIO.h

[qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Vern:

Apologies for being unclear. Yes, the attachment came through fine and thanks 
for it. My comment was purely from the thought that I need to get that access 
working again. The Registered SKB has so much more useful stuff than the 
standard SKB that I don't know why I haven't worked through the problem before 
now...

...except that this isn't the first time and I have yet to think of any reason 
why it'll be the last. Frustration kicks in after a few years, ya' know?

Tom Liotta

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   6. RE: QUSRTOOL and asyncIO.h (Vernon Hamberg)
>
>Tom, I tried this early morning to send you an attachment with the 
>modified source member for TSO - did it get stripped or maybe 
>embedded in the message? It's about 213KB. Let me know, I'll find 
>another way to get it to you.
>
>I also sent it to Simon, I think.
>
>At 08:16 PM 10/17/2005, you wrote:
>
>>Sigh. I guess now I'll have to go through whatever it is that gets 
>>my Registered SKB access working again. It's been a couple years... 
>>the user/password scheme change that they went through time before 
>>last last was when it quit working. I tired of trying after the 
>>first 90 mins or so of digging through their various suggestions and 
>>documentation on how to enable it.