Re: 520 Performance

I would expect the Mirrored Systems to be slower since the base boxes only 
have 2 drives unless they aren't doing much writing...


_____________________
Kirk Goins CCNA
Systems Engineer, Manage Inc.
IBM Certified i5 Solution Sales
IBM Certified iSeries Solutions Expert
IBM Certified Designing IBM e-business Solutions 
Office 503-353-1721 x106 Cell 503-577-9519
kirkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx      www.manageinc.com

There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those that understand binary, and those that don't.



Larry Bolhuis <lbolhuis@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
10/07/2005 08:15 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: 520 Performance







Marco,

Where are you seeing this performance gap?

They do have the same processor (0.2 of a 1.5Ghz POWER5)) and cpw 
(500/30).so given similair I/O and Memory configurations performance 
would be identical.

  - Larry

Marco Facchinetti wrote:

>Did somebody notice an HUGE performance gap between the 0900/7393 and a
>0900/7413 (the second and the third model in the express family)?
>
>They are supposed to have the same processor, same cpw (both intaractive 
and
>batch). The 7393 has a raid controller. What we can see is that the 7393 
is
>5 times faster than the 7413.
>
>Any comments?
>
>Marco
>