RE: CALLPRC & CRTBNDCL

Hi Vern,

No offense seen in this. You are just right. A CLLE module is the best
way.

Thanks, 
Arco Simonse

Vern wrote : 

> 
> Sorry, Arco, no offense meant. My comments were aimed at 
> several folks who decry the use of CL at all.
> 
> Regards
> Vern
> 
> At 07:40 AM 9/14/2005, you wrote:
> 
> >Hi Vern,
> >
> >You are right. I just gave him an example to make clear that 
> it can be 
> >done from RPG if neccessary for whatever the reason is.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Arco Simonse
> >
> >Vernon wrote:
> >
> > > I really don't understand this insistence on not using CL 
> for what 
> > > it is good for - running commands. One problem with 
> QCMDEXC is that 
> > > it does not log things the same way as running a command 
> in CL does. 
> > > Another is, you have no prompting when writing the code.
> > >
> > > Basic principle - use each language for what it is good for.
> > > CL is best for doing commands - it does stand for 
> "Command Language" 
> > > after all - and RPG is best for database processing and 
> > > display/printing. Don't try to make CL into a database 
> machine, and 
> > > don't make RPG do overrides.
> > >
> > > In the world of ILE, write the separate modules in 
> whatever language 
> > > is appropriate, then link them into one program. CL is 
> also an ILE 
> > > language.
DISCLAIMER:
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is 
the property of the sender. 
It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are not 
authorized to read, print, retain, copy,disseminate, distribute, or use this 
message or any part thereof. If you
receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
all copies of this message. 

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the 
presence of computer viruses