RE: Sequence of libraries in Library List

I would always have QTEMP at the top of my library list for temporary
objects that have been created from a 'template' object in some other
library (that's possibly in my library list). A library list search is
reasonably quick, so I wouldn't be too concerned about the order in
terms of performance. I would look at the order in terms of
functionality - 'changed' object libraries before 'permanent' object
libraries.

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Sequence of libraries in Library List
> From: Dennis Nel <dvnel.za@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, September 08, 2005 8:38 am
> To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When setting up a new JOBD what is the "best" sequence for the libraries
> on 
> the library list?
>  In particular I am refering to libraries like QGPL and QTEMP. Should
> the be 
> at the top of the LIBL or towards the bottom?
>  In the following example in which sequence would be best?
>  We have our runtime objects (*pgm, *DSPF, *PRTF) in library RTLIB .
> Our database (*PF, *LF) in library DBLIB, and other objects (*Dtaara,
> *dtaq) 
> in SELIB.
>  should the *LIBL look like, QGPL, SELIB, RTLIB, DBLIB, QTEMP?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
>