|
My experience of today's need for e-mail is that it's essential and that corporate will not tolerate it being unavailable. If this is a true statement then if you put the UDFS in say ASP2 and is set not overflow to ASP1 when you get Spammed or you have attachment issues, then in effect you have stopped e-mail from flowing. Although, you have prevented the system from becoming unavailable but in effect email is still not working. I'm assuming (sorry it you mentioned this) that that Domino is the only application on this server. How about monitoring for ASP(x) size and paging you when it hits a threshold (say 70%). Thus giving you time to deal with the problem before it get critical. We currently do this at our shop for all our ASPs. My suggested would be buy large amounts of DASD and monitor for a fairly low threshold in what ever ASP you decide to store the mailboxes. Good luck... Ken H. -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of msmith6@xxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:15 AM To: Midrange-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Domini on iSeries and UDFS Ken, Believe me. I like Simple. Reminds me of myself. I guess what I'm eluding to is, just when you think that you have enough space in you system ASP, somebody could spam enough people with a moderately sized email and all of a sudden you don't have a nice cushion. Even worse, no cushion. With alot of email databases, it wouldn't have to be a large attachment and folks might not exceed their email database size. We will be implementiong Unified Messaging as well with our Domino Servers. That allows all phone (Voice over IP) to be saved in your email inbox. So, while the average voice mail is less than a MB, I could grow fast. I do agree with you about rentention as well as training to be essential to managing space. m. >> >> >Here's my $.02 worth. KISS... I think you all know the acronym. If all >your doing is trying to control how much DASD the Domino objects are taking >in the IFS why make your system more complicated. You'll still have the >same problem on a system harder to support. Buy more DASD is aways a >option. > >I would think that a good policy on how much space a user can store on the >server is the first hurled to cross. Maybe have them store part of their >email locally on the PC. I do believe you can set storage limits on mailbox >but this should only be done if a policy is in place first. > >Ken H.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.