RE: Performance diff bet. Client Access & Telnet?

Vern, Telnet from a PC yes. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Vernon Hamberg [mailto:vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:40 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Performance diff bet. Client Access & Telnet?


I'd say Client Access has a LOT more overhead - telnet is pretty 
bare-bones. Maybe some of the other emulators are leaner, meaner. PC 
Support and its successors that became iSeries Access have always been 'way 
over-engineered - that's why Rumba, et al., had a market.

But does anyone like using the telnet key mapping? It's doable but kind of 
a tough one to remember, IMO. I use it in emergencies. Besides, you often 
can't see the underlines that make up entry fields. I'm talking telnet from 
a PC - are you talking the same thing? Or are you talking telnet from 
another 400 session?

Vern

At 10:24 AM 7/21/2005, you wrote:

>We noticed recently (visually) that the interactive response time is 
>decidedly slower on Client Access sessions vs. Telnet sessions, in cases 
>using the same IP adderess. I am trying to find an explanantion for this 
>or how to correct.
>
>Thank you,
>Phil
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>This message contains confidential information and is intended intended 
>only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you 
>should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the 
>sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
>this e-mail from your system. Finally, the recipient should check this 
>email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts 
>no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
>
>--
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.