|
This also implies that knowledge of SQL is not portable to other platforms. Nah, don't think so. Tells you something of companies sticking to international standards. Remember HTML. Regards, Carel Teijgeler *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 11-7-05 at 11:31 Booth Martin wrote: >I wonder, too, how much money his company has spent on books, seminars, >lectures, and classes on Microsoft products for him vs. what his company is >willing to spend on his learning of IBM products? Have they spent the money >on MS, but only handed him a keyboard and a manual for the IBM stuff? > >On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 22:38 -0400, Steve Richter wrote: > >> the system is enabling me to make a living but with the do nothing >> crowd at IBM I fear that will not be the case even a year or two from... >> Hoping someone can prove me wrong on all of this. I only have 1 week >> experience programming SQL on the 400. :)...
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
