Re: not allowing operator from end a specific job -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: not allowing operator from end a specific job
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:36:40 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Lim Hock-Chai wrote:
> Other than running the job with user ID that operator is not auth to,
> is there another way to not allowing operator from ending a specific
> job?

Maybe I'm not getting something, but isn't that the operators job?

Seems to me that, if you don't want the operator canceling a particular
job, you probably don't want them doing anything to the job.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: not allowing operator from end a specific job , Larry Bolhuis

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.