|
>> So it is a *good* thing to tell companies the software >> they wrote (perhaps) only a few years ago may not run >> in the future and they must re-develop it using a >> better software architecture? Even if it is currently >> doing what it is supposed to and there is no ROI for a >> re-write? MS have built a very good business doing just this. And it hasn't even been "better" - just different with multiple promises of better. >> Wow -- I hope you have pointy haired bosses >> (and investors) who will buy that reasoning. What makes you think the investors will ever hear about it? There are many cases where after wasting millions switching to Windows and/or Unix systems companies have come back to the 400 - but there are never any magazine articles that say "we screwed up" - just the original "we're moving off this old-fashioned ...." articles. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com www.RPGWorld.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
