|
Rob, this is surprising to me - if the LPAR is not activated the cards in the buses assigned to the partition will not be powered-on. The only thing that would be going on is that the drives would be spinning. Now you *would* have problems if the drives were in a RAID set but had no OS on them and you took them out, as they'd come in to the other LPAR as DPH*** identifiers when you brought them online and you'd have to initialize each one of them - that is a pain. Justin C. Haase - iSeries System Administrator IBM Certified Systems Expert - eServer i5 Kingland Systems Corporation email - justin.haase@xxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:56 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: Moving disks from one iSeries to another Wasn't he originally trying to remove drives first? That's where the problem comes in. I recently did the several phone situation. I was removing drives from an inactive lpar on a 570 and adding them to an active lpar on that same box. The inactive lpar did not even have i5/os loaded yet. I had to actually load enough i5/os to go into DST and SST. Then I could remove the drives I wanted. Putting them into the live i5/os partition concurrently was easy. Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com Larry Bolhuis <lbolhuis@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 06/06/2005 09:16 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: Moving disks from one iSeries to another OK This statement from IBM Seems pretty strange. I have installed dozens if not hundreds of drives into machines over the years with nary a hitch. I do know that depending on how you add the drives to RAID sets you can end up with new sets where you wanted to add drives to existing sets. Other than that though I'm just not sure where IBM is going with this. With i5 hardware we now have the ability to add entire towers to HSL loops and with that up to 45 drives at a whack. DId they say WHY they expected that you would be on the phone with them?? - Larry Murphy, Guy wrote: > I called IBM on this and discovered that using concurrent >maintenance to install more than one or two drives is a bad idea. What >I need to do is power down the system and install the disks. After >that, I do a manual IPL to put the disk into a parity set and add them >into the system. They said that doing it this way will save a lot of >long and involved conversations with the support center. Thanks for the >help, Marc and Paul. > > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.