|
Jack, Agreed on your first paragraph, but not on your second... Used well, CASE tools can save a lot of labor. In addition to everything else, they encourage reuse and a shared development environment. These are not natural to most traditional midrange developers, but have large benefits if used well (meaning with good standards, naming conventions, etc. so that other developers can find and reuse). What paradigm are you referring to? I believe Lansa and 2e are both doing reasonably well. I'm directly familiar with 2e and it has picked back up once Sterling sold it to CA. You can now generate HTML displays and EJB programs from the same Action Diagrams and Screen Designs. Works for me. --Chapin Kaynor Vermont In a message dated 5/3/2005 7:50:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: message: 9 date: Tue, 3 May 2005 07:51:45 -0400 from: "Jack Derham" <derhamj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: RE: Cases in AS400 I'm sure that you intended to mention that although it generates what us "old birds" consider miserable code, it did generate it consistently and that was a great help when you did have to go in and clean up. In my mind's eye, it has faded from use because the paradigm was too difficult a transition and it did not save any labor. Jack Derham Direct Systems, Inc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.