RE: 64 bit Windows...

[Al Barsa <barsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul,

You are absolutely right, but at this point in time, I don't see any reason
(with the possible exception of marketing hype) to go from 64 bit.
Virtually all of the limitations that we had at 48 bit are gone, and I
don't see any of them rearing their ugly heads again.

I certainly agree that the innate possibility for IBM to move us to 96 or
128 bit, but I'm unsure that it worth their nickel at this point in time.

Al

Al Barsa, Jr.
Barsa Consulting Group, LLC

400>390

"i" comes before "p", "x" and "z"
e gads

Our system's had more names than Elizabeth Taylor!

914-251-1234
914-251-9406 fax

http://www.barsaconsulting.com
http://www.taatool.com
http://www.as400connection.com



                                                                           
             pnelson@xxxxxxxxx                                             
             m                                                             
             Sent by:                                                   To 
             midrange-l-bounce         Midrange Systems Technical          
             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            Discussion                          
                                       <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>           
                                                                        cc 
             04/28/2005 09:28                                              
             AM                                                    Subject 
                                       RE: 64 bit Windows...               
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             Midrange Systems                                              
                 Technical                                                 
                Discussion                                                 
             <midrange-l@midra                                             
                 nge.com>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           





I once heard Frank Soltis say (perhaps it was about 5 years ago) that the
AS/400 is at the point where Microsoft and Intel want to be in 5 years, and
when they get there, IBM can flip some switches and go to 96 or 128 bit
processors (and your software will still run).

Nice crystal ball, huh?


Paul Nelson
Arbor Solutions, Inc.
708-670-6978  Cell
pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx




-----midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----

To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 04/28/2005 08:05AM
Subject: RE: 64 bit Windows...

> From: Walden H. Leverich
>
> I know what I think everytime I read a statement that's along the
lines
> of "so what, we've had that for xxx years, and you're just getting it
> now." I think, "so what, I've got it now too. What do you have that I
> don't have w/my windows solution." Look, Ford was pumping out Model Ts
> long before Toyota heard of a car, but that doesn't mean that I sould
be
> driving a Model T today. What you provided me yesterday is useless, I
> can get it anywhere, what are you going to provide me tomorrow?

Oh ugh. I'll respond, primarily because I feel weird if I don't respond
to a Walden Wuvs Windows (C) post <grin>. But this is a REALLY bad
analogy. The iSeries is hardly a Model T. It's a hemi-powered Mustang
convertible. We had the technology ten years ago, and we've made it
work.

And that's the issue. Windows is JUST BARELY getting into the world of
64-bit. And if you remember the pain and suffering of moving from
16-bit to 32-bit, you'd be wildly over-optimistic to expect a smooth
transition here. I don't expect 64-bit Windows to be fully functional
for years.

When we say we've had a feature for ten years, we mean we've had it,
worked out the kinks, and incorporated it into our base package from the
ground up.

Typically when Windows says they have a feature, it means they've got it
in alpha test stage on a few selected applications, with a nasty
thunking interface for everyone else (those of you old enough to
remember 16-bit Windows probably remember "thunking" - for the
edification of everybody else, that was the official name for using
16-bit pointers with a "32-bit" interface).

Joe

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.