|
> From: Mike Eovino > > > I run WAS just fine on the smallest model 270, which has 370CPW. This > > is a very small machine. > > Which version of WAS? And if you can't run WAS, there's always Tomcat. WAS Express (V5). Works like a charm! And you're right, Tomcat is always an option. > > What sort of machine are your clients running > > on, Trevor? The beauty of J2EE is the ability to offload it (something > > that simply can't be done with RPG-CGI or Net.Data solutions). > > Definitely a strike against Net.Data. Now, I don't have experience > with PHP using the iSeries as the database (all the PHP I've written > has used MySQL), but I'd hope that you could run your web server and > PHP on a beige box and connect to the iSeries database. No idea. The big plus in my mind with WAS is tat it is supported by IBM. If WAS doesn't work, IBM will fix it. I'm not sure how PHP support works. Personally, I'd love to see Python supported because as Hans always pointed out, Python is built for this sort of stuff. If you want to go with a scripting approach as opposed to the compiled approach of JSP, then Python is an alternative that should be explored. > Whether you go J2EE or some other method, the great thing is that we > have *choices*. ABSOLUTELY! I can't agree more. If you have zero Java skills and have no desire to learn them, and you don't want to learn a scripting language, then you can use Net.Data or RPG-CGI. There is no other box with a comparable suite of choices. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.