× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



>Other than the ADDITIONAL waste of my time.  Let me ask you this,
>Walden.  What are the chances that Microsoft will spend ANY resources
to
>create a patch for W2K Professional that will allow it to open a Lotus
>document? 

It's not likely that they'll create a patch that will allow you to open
the document. However, the reboot issue, well that's another story. And
2000 pro is still in mainstream support, at least until June 30th of
this year, so yes, they should patch that.

>Sorry, I don't find it necessary to be a part of Microsoft's Worldwide
>Software Beta Test team. 

So you don't report issues to IBM either? Don't want to be in their
"beta" team? Look, I'm not going to argue the relative stability of
Windows vs. OS/400, my point it, if you're not willing to report the
issues how will they know to fix them? Or do you just assume someone
else will report them for you?

-Walden

------------
Walden H Leverich III
President & CEO
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
  


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: Sunday, 06 March, 2005 14:45
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: When is a bug a bug?

> From: Walden H. Leverich
> 
> Joe's sounds more like a hardware issue since you didn't even get a
> BSOD. <G>

Hardware issue?  I assume you're just being silly here, Walden.


> HOWEVER, I'm not disagreeing that either of these are bugs. BUT, did
> either of you call MS? Why not? If it's a bug the call's free, so
> there's no harm.

Other than the ADDITIONAL waste of my time.  Let me ask you this,
Walden.  What are the chances that Microsoft will spend ANY resources to
create a patch for W2K Professional that will allow it to open a Lotus
document?

Tell me that you actually think this will happen, and I'll try it.  If
they do not fix it within 30 days, then you pay me my standard
consulting rate for the time it takes to call it in.


> Or would you prefer to simply keep talking about how
> bad the software is but not do anything to help fix it?

Sorry, I don't find it necessary to be a part of Microsoft's Worldwide
Software Beta Test team. 

Joe

-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.