|
Talk about being nitpicky... (snicker)... You should be in sales... Joe... (Laughing out loud) John Brandt iStudio400.com (903) 523-0708 Home of iS/ODBC - MSSQL access from iSeries and RPG. -----Original Message----- From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 8:34 AM To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' Subject: RE: Scalability > From: James Rich > > Interesting. Strictly hardware, then I would guess something like the SGI > Altix would take the crown. Trouble is, how do you define hardware? What > about 100s of blades? Actually, we're talking how to scale up an application. Here's my offline reply to Murali (the same argument applies to those of you who try to argue a blade rack or a server farm): It means that you can write an application on a small iSeries that serves five users. As your needs grow, you can upgrade the server to larger and larger boxes and, without having to change the application, support hundreds or thousands of users. If you write a Unix application on a small box for five users and then want to support more users it will go something like this: add ten or twenty users, you can simply add RAM to the Unix machine and a faster processor and some more disk, but you will probably have to add someone to tune your database. As you approach 100 users, you may need another server, at which time you will have to worry about inter-machine communications. Your programming staff will need to make sure all servers are running the same version of the code. You'll also need someone to administer the database and someone to make sure passwords are synchronized between machines. And since your database is now on a different machine than your application, your performance will suffer due to latency issues (as you well know). As you grow towards 1000 users, you'll need to add more and more servers, and more and more support staff to keep them running. At this point backups and operating system patches and application fixes become a nightmare. Security is an issue, and so is network throughput. With the iSeries, it will still be just one machine, with simple backups and easy management, no network issues and no database latency. In the most complex scenario, you will need an additional machine to support high availability, along with a database mirroring package. But you'll still be able to survive with a very small support staff and not a lot of time spent on system management. Joe -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.849 / Virus Database: 577 - Release Date: 1/27/05 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 2/3/05 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.5 - Release Date: 2/3/05
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.