× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



We have a couple of 270's, (and it's every 8 weeks, not every 6 weeks).
GDI-270-23F1, 
System ASP . . . . . . :    140.6 G
% system ASP used  . . :    85.4166
RCLSTG took 1 hour and 38 minutes
GDI has some Domino and a few copies of BPCS on it for testing.

MAILTWO-270-2454
System ASP . . . . . . :    527.4 G
% system ASP used  . . :    66.3169
RCLSTG took 15 minutes.  Ran every week.
MAILTWO has all Domino.  Only 1 os/400 partition.  But 8 Domino 
partitions.

I am in the process of running RTVDSKINF.  I tried PRTDSKINF *SYS on both 
and it was a year or two out of date.

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
12/22/2004 11:18 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
RCLSTG for OS Upgrade ???










We are making preparations to upgrade our Domino server, a 270 running
V5R1, to V5R3 next month.  All that's really on this box are Notes
databases, Robot, and BRMS.  It's behind on PTF's but I have the latest
V5R1 ones ready to load.  It's at 70.7% of 113GB of disk.  We don't do
journaling.

I've worked here almost two years in that time it has never had a RCLSTG
done on it.  For that matter, it's probably been much, much longer since
one was done, if ever.  (The QRCLSTG data area is empty.)  At my former 
job
we typically ran a RCLSTG about every six weeks.  There hasn't been a
pressing need to do one here and there is a desire to have Notes available
24/7.  Given the history of our system it could potentially run for many
hours.

I have seen remarks in the archives recommending it for an OS upgrade.  I
know that it identifies damaged and lost objects and tries to recover 
them.

Since I will need to justify the extended downtime do we "need" to do it 
or
at least a RCLSTG *DBXREF?  We are planning to put the V5R1 PTF's on now
and V5R3 in January.  If we need to do it I would think that it would need
to be done as close to V5R3 time as possible or should we do it both now
and then?  Any advice would be appreciated.


Dave Parnin
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.