Re: Why separate pools? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Why separate pools?
From: Bryan Dietz <BDietz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:57:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The benefit is memory management.

I has always tried to keep "like" jobs in the same pools, ie. interactive,
batch, ect.

----------------------------
Bryan Dietz
Aktion Associates


midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/23/2004 08:04:19 AM:

> What benefit is there to separating resources into distinct pools?
>
      <snip>
>
> Maybe there is some benefit to an alternative product, but I am still
> struggling with the first question at top.
>
> Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Why separate pools? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.