Re: Microsoft thwarted again

[pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx]

Too bad Dr. Frank Soltis can't talk about them anymore.


Paul Nelson
Arbor Solutions, Inc.
708-670-6978  Cell
pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx





Don <dr2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
11/19/2004 12:44 PM
Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
 
        To:     Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Microsoft thwarted again




Uh, the serious money is saying that the 400's are still running MS...



On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Bill Heinz wrote:

> Just for laughs, does anyone have a screenshot of the XP web page that
> plainly showed a "wall" of AS/400 CISC racks and someone working on a
> green screen on the far side of the room?
>
> Jerry wrote:
>
> >Call it a case of bad karma. As part of Microsoft's crusade to build 
support for
> >its Windows operating system in the enterprise, the software giant 
launched an
> >anti-Unix Web site with server partner Unisys last week, as part of a 
campaign
> >to portray Unix as a complex operating system that unnecessarily ties 
users to
> >expensive hardware.
> >
> >Such a denigrating tactic would hardly garner much ink on a normal news 
day,
> >except for the revelation of the embarrassing fact that the anti-Unix 
Web site
> >itself was actually running on Unix software--specifically the Apache 
Web
> >server and the FreeBSD operating system, according to a Netcraft query. 
The
> >plot grew thicker the next day, when after much negative publicity the
> >anti-Unix Web site was moved to a Windows 2000 server running Internet
> >Information Server, Microsoft's Web server, and promptly quit working.
> >
> >The whole episode was painfully reminiscent of a similar episode that 
occurred
> >two years ago, when a highly placed source within IBM leaked to the 
press a
> >lurid story about Microsoft and its use of the AS/400 server.
> >
> >Microsoft was unable to migrate to Windows NT from some 23 AS/400s that 
ran an
> >ERP system for the company's manufacturing division, and had to revert 
back to
> >the AS/400, which, according to the source, was administered remotely 
via an
> >application service provider.
> >
> >LOL,
> >
> >Jerry
> >
> >--
> >This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
> >To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> >or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> >at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
> >
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.