|
Nothing is trusted anyway. Not paper ballots. Not mechanical paper ballots (hanging chads). Nothing. There will always be an argument saying why it's bad. Thus, should all attempts to improve be permanently shelved? After all, if it's all going to be tied up in the courts anyway, why spend the money on trying to improve the equipment when it could be better spent on something less controversial? Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com Jerry <jdraper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 11/01/2004 03:25 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Fax to Subject Re: electronic voting tomorrow The trust by "users" of electronic voting systems is amazing. Hey, without even trying programmers I've seen programmers produce printouts that aren't remotely relative to the input data. Jerry Draper -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
