RE: SBCS Primary w/ DBCS Secondary on V5R3?

[Bruce Vining <bvining@xxxxxxxxxx>]

A system with 2984 will have different system value defaults, different
CCSIDs associated with some fields in IBM supplied outfiles, a different
CCSID associated with the system cross reference file, and the like.  These
differences may or may not be significant to your environment, but do
provide a sufficiently different system environment from 2924 that users
may want to continue using 2984.

For existing 2984 systems (or a new system entering into an existing
network) there is no clear reason for them to change to 2924.  For a brand
new system you have your choice.



                                                                           
             "Urbanek, Marty"                                              
             <Marty_Urbanek@st                                             
             ercomm.com>                                                To 
             Sent by:                  <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>           
             midrange-l-bounce                                          cc 
             s+bvining=us.ibm.                                             
             com@xxxxxxxxxxxx                                      Subject 
                                       RE: SBCS Primary w/ DBCS Secondary  
                                       on V5R3?                            
             10/12/2004 10:42                                              
             AM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             Midrange Systems                                              
                 Technical                                                 
                Discussion                                                 
                                                                           
                                                                           




If a V5R3 system with an SBCS primary language can support DBCS secondary
languages, then what is the use for Primary Lang 2984 English U/L DBCS?
(why would anyone ever need a DBCS English language feature?)

The reason I ask is because we're working on the config for a new i5 and
we've configured it with 2984 as the primary (with intent to install 5562
DBCS as one of the secondaries). Prior to V5R3 it would have been necessary
to do it this way, but I'm wondering if it still is or if we could have
2924 as primary instead. If either one would work, any pros/cons either
way?

Thanks,
-Marty

------------------------------

date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:10:57 -0500
from: Bruce Vining <bvining@xxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: SBCS Primary w/ DBCS Secondary on V5R3?

Go to the V5R3 Information Center and select
Programming/Globalization/What's new for V5R3

The first item is what you are looking for.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.