× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I'm trying to develop the program logic flow for a Canadian zip code
ranging program.  I've written an easy zip code ranging progam for US zip
codes.  It was easy to write because all I had to do was check to see if
the current_zipcode was equal to the previous_zipcode plus 1.

Below is an example of how the program ranged the input file.
Input file:
CITY1       13760
CITY1       13761
CITY1       13762
CITY2       13855
CITY2       13856
CITY3       12345
CITY3       12348
CITY4       23567
CITY5       65432

Output file:
CITY1       13760 - 13762
CITY2       13855 - 13856
CITY3       12345 - 00000
CITY3       12348 - 00000
CITY4       23567 - 00000
CITY5       65432 - 00000

Here's how I want to range the Canadian zip codes:
Input file:
CITY1       T0B0Z0
CITY2       T0A0A0
CITY3       T0A0C0
CITY4       T4A1A1
CITY4       T4A1A2
CITY4       T4A1A3
CITY4       T4A1B1
CITY4       T4A1B2
CITY4       T4A1B3
CITY4       T4A1D1
CITY4       T4A1D2
CITY4       T4A1D3

Output file:
CITY1       T0B0Z0 - 000000
CITY2       T0A0A0 - 000000
CITY3       T0A0C0 - 000000
CITY4       T4A1A1 - T4A1B3
CITY4       T4A1D1 - T4A1D3

Here's some ideas of what I was trying to make something out of:
> if first 5 positions from current_zipcode is equal to first 5 positions
of previous_zipcode, they match, now check to make sure the 6th position is
in numerical sequence with the previous_zipcode
      -if not in sequence, start a new range
      -if in sequence, get next record to see if it's also in sequence

> if first 5 positions from current_zipcode do not match first 5 positions
of previous_zipcode
      -if first 4 positions from current_zipcode is equal to first 4
positions of previous_zipcode, they match, now check to make sure the
      5th positions is in alphabetical sequence with the previous_zipcode
            *if not in sequence, start a new range
            *if in sequence, get next record to see if it's also in
sequence

The above might be a good way to go, but if anyone else has a better/easier
way to get this done, please let me know.

Thanks,

Frank



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.