IAAI Version 0.2 pre-release now available

XPOST: IGNITE/400, MIDRANGE-L, RPG400-L

As a follow up, the benchmarks are now currently available!

Go to http://forums.plutabrothers.com/IAAI to see more.

Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 9:02 AM
> To: 'Joe Pluta'
> Subject: IAAI Version 0.2 pre-release
> 
> XPOST: IGNITE/400, MIDRANGE-L, RPG400-L
> 
> This is just a quick message to pre-announce release 0.2 of the IAAI
> Benchmark tests.  Currently, the benchmark suite is up to 42 tests,
> comparing performance in both database I/O (native, embedded SQL, JDBC
and
> record-level access (RLA) through the JTOpen toolkit) and basic
decimal
> arithmetic (Java BigDecimal vs. RPG packed decimal).
> 
> The framework is robust enough to support a wide variety of additional
> tests, and everything runs from green-screen commands (it took a bit
of
> magic to get that to work; thanks to Barbara Morris as always for her
> boundless knowledge of things RPG, especially RPG to Java).  There is
> still work to be done (load testing and multi-tier tests are not yet
> supported), but I think you'll be impressed by what can be done.
> 
> Also, I'd like better reporting.  Right now I'm doing everything
through
> SQL and then pulling it into Excel.  I'd like to do better than that,
but
> that will wait for the next release.
> 
> I hope to put together the IAAI's first white paper this weekend.  The
> results are quite conclusive, at least in my eyes.  Just out of my
head, I
> came up with a mix of operations that might represent adding a
"standard"
> order.  I figured 10 detail lines, and came up with the following list
of
> operations:
> 
> 30 reads
> 11 writes
> 10 updates
> 30 comparisons
> 20 multiplies
> 20 adds
> 
> This included pricing and inventory adjustment.  Obviously this is a
very
> arbitrary number (and in fact probably pretty low), but I thought it
was
> reasonable for a first pass.  I haven't yet benchmarked comparisons,
but
> after adding in everything else, I came up with some interesting
numbers.
> 
> On my model 270, I can process 213 orders a second using RPG and
native
> DB2.  I can process roughly 23 a second with SQL: that's an order of
> magnitude less performance.  Interestingly enough, RLA came in at
about
> the same pace, allowing 20 orders per second.  The big loser?  JDBC,
which
> only supports about 4 (FOUR) orders per second.
> 
> Note that this is without the overhead of connections in JDBC or file
> opens in RPG; all of that is factored out in the tests.  But
basically,
> RPG and native DB2 run ten times faster than SQL and FIFTY TIMES
FASTER
> than JDBC.