RE: The value of semantics (IBM document)

<g>
Vern

OK, did anyone copy the text? I assume it's been fixed since I don't see
anything out for the ordinary there.

-Walden

------------
Walden H Leverich III
President & CEO
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vern Hamberg
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 10:39 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: The value of semantics (IBM document)

It's nice to see someone break his/her own rules - uses uppercase to
highlight comments when has said not to! Of course, the "private"
communication might have been like email, where bold was not available.

LOL
Vern

At 09:14 AM 8/23/2004, you wrote:
>There's an editor in action there...and a nice one at that. Oh, the
joys
>of documentation and letting something slip into the open. :)
>
>On 23 Aug 2004 17:09:41 +0200, "Jan Megannon" <jmegannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>said:
> > Is IBM always as transparent as this with their internal notes?
> >
> >
> >
>
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas1e25da060c91b709986256e5
a00690e73