RE: The value of semantics (IBM document)

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That'll teach us to post anything here - Big Blue is watching. Just like 
the person (unknown to me) on this list who informed MS that they had 
AS/400s in their XP tour - they took it out! Doh!

<g>
Vern

At 10:36 AM 8/25/2004, you wrote:
> OK, did anyone copy the text? I assume it's been fixed since I don't see
> anything out for the ordinary there.
>
> -Walden
>
>
> ------------
> Walden H Leverich III
> President & CEO
> Tech Software
> (516) 627-3800 x11
> WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.TechSoftInc.com
>
> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
> (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vern Hamberg
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 10:39 AM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: The value of semantics (IBM document)
>
> It's nice to see someone break his/her own rules - uses uppercase to
> highlight comments when has said not to! Of course, the "private"
> communication might have been like email, where bold was not available.
>
> LOL
> Vern
>
> At 09:14 AM 8/23/2004, you wrote:
> >There's an editor in action there...and a nice one at that. Oh, the
> joys
> >of documentation and letting something slip into the open. :)
> >
> >On 23 Aug 2004 17:09:41 +0200, "Jan Megannon" <jmegannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >said:
> > > Is IBM always as transparent as this with their internal notes?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas1e25da060c91b709986256e5
> a00690e73