Re: LPAR on very small machines -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: LPAR on very small machines
From: Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:28:50 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Well, this doesn't clear it up but has a LOT of facts
surrounding LPARS and several new "terms" that I have
not seen before. LPARS are not for the "faint of heart"
or "faint of the wallet"...

http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/lpar/pdf/LPAR_FAQ_V1.00.pdf

I would not plan on LPARS for anything under a very high 520
at the very least.


Al Barsa wrote:

My 520 has .43 processors (isn't that user friendly), and each processor can support up to 10 partitions.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: LPAR on very small machines , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.